Bob Bromley

Bob Bromley
Weledeh

Statements in Debates

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 16)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. My understanding was we wanted to make sure that people had additional supplementary benefits and health benefits coverage beyond the territorial GNWT coverage in order to protect GNWT resources, essentially third-party, and that we were going to promote that. That’s the statistic that I’m looking for.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 16)

Thank you. Very briefly…

---Technical difficulties

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 16)

Thank you. Is territorial coverage, GNWT coverage, included in the 90 percent?

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 16)

That’s obvious, I would say, given that we’re only up two here net, but we’ve heard about six new positions. It suggests that two of those new positions must be paid in the order of $300,000 or something like that. Again, the math is fuzzy. I note that the other divisions do manage their compensation and benefits in just about every case. Just in the directorate we seem to have this issue. Thank you.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 16)

Really the point is here that we only hear about the challenges and kerfuffles when we visit the hospital as committee. I think it would be useful to hear from the Minister some objective assessment of this situation so that we can help him make sure that situation is managed. I’ll leave it at that. Thank you.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 16)

Thank you, Madam Chair. Thank you very much for that information, both questions. On the first one, I guess I would now have to ask why it isn’t up a lot more. That’s a lot of positions to add for the amount that this department has gone up, a $600,000 increase, roughly, from last year, a little bit less, and I think I counted two, four, five, six positions there. That seems pretty efficient. Just a comment there.

My last question on this page is also related to 8-14, so I’ll be ahead of everybody else by covering two pages at once here. The grants and contributions, $685,000, the second line...

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 16)

I think it would be great if these dollars continued to come, obviously, but in the meantime it makes me very nervous. We’ve been through this before. We were all in the panic when it happened in the 16th because we are using this temporary money for basic service delivery. I think we have made some progress. I’m hoping midwifery, for example, is no longer in that one-off funding.

I will leave it at that. I don’t need any more information right now, but perhaps the Minister can recommit, if he hasn’t already, to work with committee on this as soon as he has information. I would think committee...

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 16)

I’ll leave it at that. I’m not sure that’s entirely accurate, but I will take the Minister’s word here. Thank you.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 16)

I believe the THSSI money is not necessarily meant to cover these things. They will be starting again in one form or another. Has THSSI been approved at some point?

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 16)

I’m trying not to ask questions that we already have the information on. Yes, we do have that information. We’ve had briefings ad infinitum with the Minister of Human Resources and so on, Minister of Finance, about the reasons, so I think we have some appreciation for all that. I’m just asking, with respect to the ’14-15 year, if any of these are actually inactive positions proposed to make inactive positions into active positions or vice versa and whether you expect to do that during the ’14-15 fiscal year. Thank you.