Daryl Dolynny

Thank you, Mr. Chair. The rationale for this motion is quite simple. This is simply a tool. This is a tool that will help government create a better and more promising forecasting predictability in the wake…

Thank you, Madam Chair. We were on page 12-17, right, Madam Chair? Thank you very much.

I just want to follow up on the question I asked earlier about the reinvestment of the Polar Bear Brand of diamonds. I did get an indication here that every dollar will be going back into investment. Once the diamond manufacturing plants will be operational, can the deputy minister indicate what sort of investment, once this money is flowing in, will be done to promote this brand? Thank you.

If I could get you to return to page 12-7. Mr. Ramsay.

Is it ongoing or just one time here? Thank you.

I’m not going to disagree with the Minister on some of those comments, but he brought up the 2008 subprime mortgage issue. I’m not sure how that fit into the response, but anyway.

I think Members on this side of the House have made things perfectly clear. We are very concerned going into this budget on this shortfall. I believe, personally, that this shortfall has caused a tethering, if you will, in the fiscal strategy of this government. It’s unfortunate that we weren’t able to calculate that properly and I think that has put a real kink in the cogwheel in terms of what our forecasting will be...

Thank you, Madam Chair. I know it might be premature, but we know the diamond manufacturing sector is, hopefully, on its way to production here in this fiscal year. Is there a reason or rationale that we would not have included at least some degree of money in main estimates?

Seeing none, page 12-36, information item, Fur Marketing Service Revolving Fund. Any questions?

Is this going to be a stand-alone organization? Where is it located and that kind of stuff? Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. My questions will be around the same theme as my colleagues, around the personal income tax and the corporate income tax.

I guess to set the stage here is to look at what the past has shown us, and if you look at the past tabled documents when it looks at the main estimates, the curiosity I have here is I find that there has been some revised-revised estimates, that I am looking at here with respect to the ‘13-14 revised estimates. But that’s fine. We kind of got the explanation here from the deputy minister.

I just wanted to be clear; we have heard from the Minister...

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I appreciate the Minister bringing that number to the floor of the House. Can the Minister commit that if, indeed, we are going to move forward with lifeguards, that that number just quoted today in the House will come back as a supplementary appropriation? Thank you.