Daryl Dolynny

I didn’t do that last math quickly enough here, but can we get a clarification on the electricity what that percent increase is over and above the base? Thank you.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. The purpose for my question with that is it has to do with just some facts that we do know. The fact that, number one, our inventory of public housing has not changed in the last year, so we were led to believe that we were dealing with same inventory issues. We’ve also been told in this House and other forums that we have seen roughly about an 8 percent savings in retrofits and in doing more energy-smart initiatives to make our public infrastructure that much more economic. So right away we should see savings in design. We know there’s been roughly about a 7 percent...

Really, if we start adding up the numbers, about 50 percent of this $100,000 is set aside for, basically, travel, accommodations and a function. I’m trying to see how this fits in the original bylaws of the Legislative Building Society. I have a hard time fitting that in.

There are really muddy lines in the water when it looks at legacy and I think the public has shared their concern about this a number of times as well. Let’s be clear. I’m all for having a nice time to commemorate the building. I don’t want people to think I’m a party pooper here. I’m not. Far from it. But this is now public...

Thank you, Mr. Chair. I have a motion I would like to share with committee. An Act to Amend the Dental Profession Act, I move that clause 2 of Bill 21 be deleted and the following substituted:

2. Section 1 is amended by adding the following definitions in alphabetical order:

“Registrar” means the registrar of the dental profession appointed under Section 82.1; (registraire)

“unrestricted licence or registration” means a licence or registration to practice dentistry that is not suspended, cancelled or revoked or subject to the imposition of any term, condition, restriction or other requirement...

Thank you, Mr. Chair. I would like to continue my questions from the infrastructure supp regarding the $100,000 component here under the operations side. If the Minister can give us a breakdown as to what that will entail under that $100,000 expenditure. Thank you.

Finally, and I thank the Minister for his response, did we receive any submission whatsoever from any health care professional or residents of the Northwest Territories that is opposing the amendment we have today?

Thank you, Chair. I am very much familiar that we are talking about capital. I’m talking about the $100,000 to fund a public commemorative event. If I can get a breakdown of what that commemorative event will entail within the $100,000.

Thank you, Mr. Bromley. Minister Beaulieu.

Thank you, committee. I would like to thank Ms. Haener and Ms. Schofield this evening. Sergeant at-Arms, please escort our witnesses out of the Chamber. Thank you, Minister.

Does committee agree that we want to continue with Industry, Tourism and Investment?

Committee, we’re on 11-6, Environment and Natural Resources, activity summary, wildlife, infrastructure investment summary, infrastructure investments, $335,000. Does committee agree?