Daryl Dolynny

Daryl Dolynny
Range Lake

Statements in Debates

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 68)

Thank you, Mr. Williams. Ms. Bisaro.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 68)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. As I said earlier, this is public money. All I’m looking for is some accountability and transparency. With some of the quick numbers we just heard from the Minister, that totalled well over $18 million. So we are already adding more money to this pot than we are talking about here today.

Speaking about money, under the old Canada-Northwest Territories Cooperation Agreement for French and Aboriginal Languages in the NWT, the federal government invested $1.9 million to fund nine official Aboriginal languages in the Northwest Territories. This number has been static for...

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 68)

Thank you, Ms. Bisaro. Minister McLeod.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 68)

Thank you, Minister McLeod. Does committee agree?

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 68)

Thank you, Mr. Bromley. Minister McLeod.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 68)

Committee, page 383, sport, recreation and youth, operations expenditure summary, $6.792 million. Does committee agree? Ms. Bisaro.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 68)

As Members, we have to get used to a new department and what roles it plays. I apologize if I may seem a bit outlandish with some of the questions. I do appreciate the response.

Just a question on the operations side, if I may. We see an amortization entry for $25,000 in the 2014-15 year and then we don’t see any amortization entry. Was there something that was completely amortized in one year, or was that at the tail end of something that we acquired? I would just like a clarification because it’s odd that you see one entry of amortization and then no entry after that. Thank you.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 68)

As you may hear, I’m trying to find some accountability and transparency for the $15 million that is distributed annually. That is the reason for my question. As I said earlier, redundancy is the Achilles heel of language preservation and revitalization. Interestingly, the Department of ECE is blinded by the obvious and we now wait for a pending MEA review.

Can the Minister confirm if his department has done any evidence-based research on redundancy since implementing the over six levels of governance? If he has, why is he so reluctant to share that with the House? Thank you.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 68)

Seeing none. Committee, page 367, lands administration, operations expenditure summary. Any questions?

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 68)

Alright, committee, we’ll continue on with the Department of Lands. With that, I’ll turn it over to the Minister responsible for opening comments, Minister McLeod.