David Krutko

David Krutko
Mackenzie Delta

Statements in Debates

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 15)

To the motion.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 15)

Mr. Speaker, I give notice that on Tuesday, May 25th, 2010, I will move the following motion: now therefore I move, seconded by the honourable Member for Weledeh, that Tabled Document 62-16(5), Northwest Territories Water Stewardship Strategy, be referred to Committee of the Whole for consideration.

Mr. Speaker, at the appropriate time I will be seeking unanimous consent to deal with this motion today.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 15)

Thank you. General comments in regards to Tabled Document 4-16(5). Mr. Bromley.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 15)

To the motion.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 15)

Mr. Speaker, that’s the fear I have, is that they’re simply going to pay a visit. For me, that’s not consultation. I think there have been court cases in Canada, especially the Delgamuukw decision, there was also a court case here in the Northwest Territories in regard to the Mackenzie Valley Resources Act in regard to the people of Kakisa who took the Mackenzie Valley Environmental Review Board to court on the basis that they basically weren’t fully consulted. I think that we have to ensure that we do everything to protect the rights of those people, not only with land claims but also without...

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 15)

Mrs. Groenewegen, what is the wish of the committee?

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 15)

To the motion. Mrs. Groenewegen.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 15)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, in regards to my Member’s statement, I talked about the regulatory process and the affect it has on land claims agreements. So my questions are probably better directed to the Minister of Aboriginal Affairs, the Premier.

Mr. Speaker, under the McCrank report, page 14, which talks about any fundamental restructuring in regards to the agreement, all the parties to comprehensive land claims agreements, comprehensive land claims agreements are constitutionally protected and any amendments without the effective parties being in the agreement cannot be amended...

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 15)

Question has been called.

---Carried

Does committee agree that we have concluded Committee Report 2-16(5)?

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 15)

Are you making a motion, Mr. Hawkins?