David Ramsay

Page 63, clause 109, clause 110, clause 111, and clause 112.

Page 86, clause 171.

Yes, I thank the Premier for his economics lesson, Mr. Speaker, but the problem is, and the fact remains, that the last cost-benefit analysis that was done on the project was done in 2002 at 60 to 70 million dollars. The project has more than doubled in price. The totals were, at the time, $4.50 to $5 a tonne, that’s what the cost benefit analysis was based on in 2002. Totals now are going to be $6.75 a tonne. All I’m asking, Mr. Speaker, is where is the evidence? If the Premier can stand up here today and say that that is in fact the truth, show us. I haven’t seen anything that would...

Thank you very much, Mr. Wright. Ms. Lee.

Page 35, clause 42 and clause 43.

Thank you, Ms. Lee. Minister Krutko.

Question has been called. All those in favour? All those opposed? The motion is carried.

---Carried

Thank you, committee. To clause 128, as amended.

Thank you, committee. We’ll turn our attention to Bill 6, Workers’ Compensation Act. If we start, committee, on page 16, Bill 6, Workers’ Compensation Act, part 1 is the interpretation, purpose and application. Clause 1.

Thank you, Mr. Wright. Ms. Lee.

Page 47, clauses 68, 69 and 70.