David Ramsay

David Ramsay
Kam Lake

Statements in Debates

Debates of , (day 5)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, like I mentioned earlier, it’s long overdue and I think it will be much of a benefit to the park staff that’s out there that this amendment is in place and I’d much prefer amendments like this that give our employees some more things to work with in the field rather than us building, you know, big fences and things like that to try to corral people and go at it that way. I think this is much more useful.

In the Minister’s opening remarks he doesn’t really get down to saying that parks officers will actually be able to issue tickets under the Parks Act...

Debates of , (day 5)

Same.

Debates of , (day 4)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I would like to recognize a former classmate of mine, Adelle Gaudet. Her name now may have changed, but it was Gaudet when we were in school together. Thank you.

---Applause

Debates of , (day 4)

Question has been called, however, I recognize that there isn’t a quorum at this time, so what I will do, before I ring the bells I’m going to take a second to recognize Mr. Vickers’ class from Ecole St. Joseph School that’s with us here in the gallery today. Welcome, folks.

---Applause

Mr. Vickers’ class has a few interesting gentlemen. Mr. Dent’s son, Tyler, is in Mr. Vickers’ class…

---Applause

…as well as the Premier’s grandson, Gage….

---Applause

…and my nephew Ryan is also in Mr. Vickers’ class…

---Applause

…and Mr. Ouellette’s son, as well. Welcome. Wow.

---Applause

Welcome very much to the...

Debates of , (day 4)

Thank you, committee. I’d like to call Committee of the Whole to order and ask what is the wish of committee. Mr. Menicoche.

Debates of , (day 4)

Thank you, Mr. Hawkins. The motion is in order. To the motion.

Debates of , (day 4)

Thank you. For the record, we’re on Committee Report 2-15(5). Mr. Hawkins.

Debates of , (day 4)

Yes, thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, the Minister still didn’t answer the fundamental question here. That fundamental question is, why were Members of this side of the House not informed of the change in this project? Mr. Speaker, if I could, last year we were told that a key factor to relocating that program to Hay River was the fact that there was a facility there. That has changed. It’s fundamental; it’s simple to see, Mr. Speaker. Why were Regular Members not advised, Mr. Speaker? That’s what I’d like to know. Thank you.

Debates of , (day 4)

Question has been called. All those in favour? All those opposed? The motion is carried.

---Carried

Thank you, committee. Does committee agree that consideration of Committee Report 1-15(5) is concluded?