Michael McLeod

Michael McLeod
Deh Cho

Statements in Debates

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 4th Session (day 30)

Mr. Chairman, the Member is quite anxious, as are a lot of people in the Sahtu and other areas in the NWT, to see a road constructed. However, we’re not quite at that stage yet. In the event that we come to that juncture, we would require a federal investment to do the actual construction. That’s still their responsibility.

We’ve been really working hard to try to get information compiled. We’ve just completed an economic analysis of the benefits that would come from such a road. We are now embarking on doing the project description report. The communities of Inuvik and Tuktoyaktuk have...

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 4th Session (day 29)

The Member’s correct; there is an increase as a result of increased utility costs. That’s reflected in here.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 4th Session (day 29)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Yes, I do have some opening comments.

This budget proposes increases of $4.6 million to cover forced growth and $1.8 million for strategic initiatives. It also includes two major structural changes to the department’s operations expenditures in the areas of amortization and utility and building maintenance budgets. This year the department has, on the advice of the Auditor General’s office, adjusted the way it accounts for the amortization of assets. This change realizes a 5 percent or $5 million increase to the department’s budget for amortization of capital assets...

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 4th Session (day 29)

Mr. Chairman, these are recovery of costs incurred by NAV Canada for their share of electrical, heating, janitorial, water, and ATB maintenance.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 4th Session (day 29)

It should be obvious. It’s a one-year budget, so it’s one year.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 4th Session (day 29)

Mr. Chairman, the $95,000 is for maintenance.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 4th Session (day 29)

A little bit of a concern. Some of this information is in the supp. The project budget is now $7.6 million for the bypass road in Yellowknife.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 4th Session (day 29)

Mr. Chairman, we have not considered using this pot of money to do the geotech work that the Member is referring to. That work has already been done. It has been done for some time, so we wouldn’t propose to do it again unless there was something relative to the issue of climate change and its impacts.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 4th Session (day 29)

Thank you, Mr. Chair. This money is in place at $264,000 until the year 2016-2017. In response to the Member’s question about whether or not we could use this money to do studies on chipseal or dust suppressants in the communities, the type of analysis that he’s referring to has already been done through MACA. They have all the dust suppressant testing for what would work best in the communities. We also, I guess, are doing something in the neighbourhood by testing the new products that are coming out such as Easy Street and we may consider using some of this money to see if that’s something...

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 4th Session (day 29)

Absolutely.