Sandy Lee

Sandy Lee
Range Lake

Statements in Debates

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 1)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I give notice that on Wednesday, March 3, 2010, I will move that Bill 2, An Act to Amend the Dental Auxiliaries Act, be read for the first time. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 1)

The standard is the best interests of the child. We know that a lot could be put into that, but whenever a child protection worker intervenes, they have to justify and answer for it and there are a group of people that are working on that. I think, in this case, what would be helpful is if I could have a private discussion with the Member. Perhaps this family is not aware of all the support that they can get, and I’d be happy to work with the Member to help this family if we can. But, really, I am aware and I could give the Member stats on the fact that our system really works to work with...

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 1)

Mr. Speaker, the entire Foundation for Change is based on making sure that people in our health care system do what they’re most suited to do. So I can’t answer to the Member’s question about doctors looking at files. I can’t imagine that we would ask them to look at their files for any other purpose than for which they are being paid to do, which is to provide doctor services.

Mr. Speaker, he’s asking a very general question. I’ve answered already. The primary care clinic consolidation might be requiring the staff to look at their files, but, Mr. Speaker, I can say once again that my...

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 1)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. In our policy and practice we give a lot of recognition to family members, extended families. As much as possible we would like the extended families involved. In fact, there are many children in care who are being fostered by extended families and relatives. We do pay them, as we would any other parents or families who take care of the children on a short-term basis or long-term basis. Without knowing the specifics of what the Member is talking about, I can’t get into the details and we wouldn’t do that here anyway. In general, we do recognize family members to a...

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 1)

One example that I can think of is we’ve been reviewing the specialist services to see what services we provide, how they are being provided. The Stanton CEO and the department and refocusing government have been working on that. We have also done a review on medical travel, because that is a part that is completely dependent on demand and the requests that are made from the doctors and other service providers. That’s under review, and supplementary health benefits. We just went through a very detailed analysis on exactly how many people accessed that, how much it costs and who’s accessing...

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 1)

I’m not sure if those are apples and oranges or peaches and cream.

---Laughter

The NWT Seniors’ Society is made up of Mr. Tom Wilson as president, from Fort Simpson, and Florence Barnaby, Bea Campbell, and we had a new member from Tuktoyaktuk that was appointed, and Eileen Collins from Hay River, and Leon Peterson from Fort Smith. They are really well-regarded and well-respected grandmothers and grandfathers from all over the Territories. It is a really good group.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 1)

The motion was a recommendation to the government. We have adhered to the motion. They told us to take it back, look at the facts, do that analysis and do the consultation. We are doing that right now.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 1)

It is, once again, incorrect for the Member to say that we do not bill private insurance. I just said that there are some things that the government has to provide that nobody else would pay. So you wouldn’t bill somebody for something that they wouldn’t be paying in the first place.

Supplementary health and entire health and social services sustainability is very important. As I’ve stated before, the Government of Ontario projects that they are going to be spending half of their entire budget on the health and social services system. We as Canadian people and NWT residents need to look at what...

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 1)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. We don’t have a problem with doing that. I think what I wanted to make sure that the Member knows is that we have not decided on how this is going to look. We haven’t decided that, Mr. Speaker. We have done the research and analysis that we were asked to do. I think the Member might think… The Member has suggested that the Minister knew what she wanted and engineered the research to look like that. I disagree with that. I believe any fair-minded people that look at the facts will see that the facts take us to a certain direction, and that’s what we want to take out to...

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 1)

Mr. Speaker, I don’t know what he means by wasted money. Our government makes the investment of $326 million on our health care services, the services that our people need. People on the ground are working 24/7 to deliver the care that people need. Special services that we provide to Nunavut, those specialists work on contract with the GNWT and sometimes they have contracts with Nunavut. So I don’t think, you know, it doesn’t help the debate to mix up apples and oranges and throw out statements saying that we are wasting money.

With respect to supplementary health benefits, I believe that the...