Wendy Bisaro

Wendy Bisaro
Frame Lake

Statements in Debates

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 23)

Thank you, committee. Thank you, Minister Miltenberger. Committee, we’re on pages 11-6 and 11-7. Any questions, committee? Page 11-6, 11-7, activity summary, wildlife, infrastructure investment summary, total infrastructure investment summary, $286,000. We are agreed?

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 23)

I will now rise and report progress. Thank you, committee.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 23)

Thank you, committee. Thank you to the witnesses for your attendance here today. Thank you, Minister Ramsay. Sergeant-at-Arms, if you would please escort the witnesses from the Chamber.

Okay, committee, we’ll move onto the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, page 11-2, department summary, infrastructure investment summary, total infrastructure investment summary, $1.861 million. We will defer this page until we’ve concluded the department. We’ll move onto page 11-6, activity summary, wildlife, infrastructure investment summary, total infrastructure investment summary, $286,000...

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 21)

Just a couple of comments to the Minister. I do believe that the Dementia Centre is owned by the government. There was a great deal of consternation when that happened, so I’m pretty sure that it’s owned by the government.

With regard to Mildred Hall and J.H. Sissons not appearing in the capital plan, the budget document that’s been tabled doesn’t show future years, but I’m very pleased to hear the Minister say that Mildred Hall and J.H. Sissons will be in ’14-15, because that’s not the information that we were given at committee. I’m very glad to hear the Minister say that on record, because...

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 21)

Thanks to the Minister for that commitment. I look forward to seeing that report made public. I guess I still don’t quite understand the rationale for this current situation, so I would like to ask the Minister again: Is there a reason why the report would not be tabled before the management response is prepared?

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 21)

Thank you, Minister Lafferty. I have nobody else on the list. Are there any other questions? Mr. Bromley.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 21)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I would like to follow up with the Minister of Education, Culture and Employment. I’m a little confused about some of the information that he was giving me with regard to the Student Financial Assistance Program review. I understood the Minister to say that the document or report has been done. There has been a response from management – I presume that to be the department staff – and that he as a Minister must review that before anything can be made public.

I’d like to ask the Minister why the report must remain private before the Minister determines the response. Why...

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 21)

Thank you, Minister Lafferty. Mr. Moses.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 21)

To the Minister, he’s telling me that it’s public information and yet the report is not in the public realm. I’m having a little trouble understanding how he references it as being public.

So to the Minister, since the report is not yet available to the public and the recommendations are not there so that the public and Members can discuss them, I’d like to ask the Minister if he could give me a bit of a summary of what the recommendations in the report are.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 21)

Thank you, Mr. Dolynny. Minister Lafferty.