Daryl Dolynny

Daryl Dolynny
Range Lake

Statements in Debates

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 4th Session (day 22)

Committee, again, page 5, 2013-2014, Mr. Hawkins.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 4th Session (day 22)

Thank you, Minister Miltenberger. Mr. Hawkins, your time is up. Last person speaking on this subject on page 5 is Mrs. Groenewegen.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 4th Session (day 22)

Well, I guess we didn’t get a response to that. I guess we’ll ask that question once – if I’m hearing correctly – this information is tabled. Unfortunately, this information is going to be tabled after the requirement of a decision to be made on the floor of the House before then. It’s very, very unfortunate.

I’m going to use the last remaining of my time to once again indicate my dismay and my dissatisfaction of, being a Member of this committee, not being able to have this information tabled well in advance. This information could have been available to public. It could have been available to...

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 4th Session (day 22)

Thank you, Minister Miltenberger. Would Mr. Neudorf care to clarify? Minister Miltenberger.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 4th Session (day 22)

Thank you, Minister Miltenberger. Moving on with questions on page 5 here, I have Mr. Hawkins.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 4th Session (day 22)

Thank you, Madam Chair. We seem to be speaking in general terms here and I guess I’ll ask a question. If there were 41 risks out there in this project, and there were 18 of those risks that were deemed extremely high, is that a concern for a department if that is indeed a hypothetical ratio? Would 18 out of 41 be considered a problematic ratio moving forward? Thank you, Madam Chair.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 4th Session (day 22)

Thank you, Minister Miltenberger. General comments. Thank you, committee. We’re hearing general detail. Committee, I’m going to ask you to turn to page 5 of your supplementary, 2013-2014, Supplementary Appropriation, No. 1, (Infrastructure Expenditures). Transportation, capital investment expenditures, highways, not previously authorized, $60 million, total department, not previously authorized, $60 million. Mr. Bromley.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 4th Session (day 22)

Thank you, Mr. Bromley. Mr. Miltenberger.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 4th Session (day 22)

Thank you, Mr. Neudorf. Mr. Hawkins.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 4th Session (day 22)

No, I’m fully aware, and I appreciate the Minister for again reassuring the people in the House of the breakdown. The question I have is will this show up in the appropriate cost-estimate breakdown at a moment in time when we do have that tabled in the House. Will that actually show up as a line entry, as a supp line within the budget? Thank you.