Daryl Dolynny

Thank you, Mr. Hawkins. For that we’ll go to Mr. Ramsay.

Thank you, Mrs. Groenewegen. Minister Miltenberger.

We’ll ask the Minister first if he’s prepared to answer it. If not, we’ll get you to repeat or rephrase it. Mr. Miltenberger.

Committee, again, page 5, 2013-2014, Mr. Hawkins.

Thank you, Minister Miltenberger. Mr. Hawkins, your time is up. Last person speaking on this subject on page 5 is Mrs. Groenewegen.

Well, I guess we didn’t get a response to that. I guess we’ll ask that question once – if I’m hearing correctly – this information is tabled. Unfortunately, this information is going to be tabled after the requirement of a decision to be made on the floor of the House before then. It’s very, very unfortunate.

I’m going to use the last remaining of my time to once again indicate my dismay and my dissatisfaction of, being a Member of this committee, not being able to have this information tabled well in advance. This information could have been available to public. It could have been available to...

Thank you, Minister Miltenberger. Would Mr. Neudorf care to clarify? Minister Miltenberger.

Thank you, Minister Miltenberger. Moving on with questions on page 5 here, I have Mr. Hawkins.

Thank you, Madam Chair. We seem to be speaking in general terms here and I guess I’ll ask a question. If there were 41 risks out there in this project, and there were 18 of those risks that were deemed extremely high, is that a concern for a department if that is indeed a hypothetical ratio? Would 18 out of 41 be considered a problematic ratio moving forward? Thank you, Madam Chair.

Thank you, Minister Miltenberger. General comments. Thank you, committee. We’re hearing general detail. Committee, I’m going to ask you to turn to page 5 of your supplementary, 2013-2014, Supplementary Appropriation, No. 1, (Infrastructure Expenditures). Transportation, capital investment expenditures, highways, not previously authorized, $60 million, total department, not previously authorized, $60 million. Mr. Bromley.