Daryl Dolynny
Statements in Debates
Thank you, Minister Beaulieu. Mr. Druyan, Mr. Neudorf and Ms. Chesworth, thank you for joining us this evening in the House. Committee, we’ll open up Bill 61 to general comments. Is committee prepared to go to detail?
Can the Minister indicate why?
Thank you, Minister Lafferty. Ms. Murphy, Mr. Grundy, welcome back to the House.
Committee, again, we’re on Bill 45. We’re going to open it up to general comments. Mr. Bromley.
Thank you, Mr. Neudorf. Mr. Hawkins.
Thank you. I appreciate the response. We heard the term monitor, which I think is of importance to Members of this side of the House. So I guess the question we should be asking is in this monitoring there must be some measurable, there must be information that would be subscribed to in terms of finding efficiencies within this Fine Option Program.
Will the department and will the Minister commit on sharing that information as this act comes on board and be able to share the success or the failures of this program as it relates to this act being passed? Thank you.
Thank you, Minister. Does committee agree?
Thank you, Minister Beaulieu. Does committee agree?
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I’m going to chime in here with my colleague Mr. Menicoche. What we’re hearing here today is absolutely hogwash. We’ve got a northern contractor here, the only northern contractor left that has yet to be paid for the work and services they did on the bridge, and we’ve got a referee program that we’ve clearly documented and the government has said we agree with the terms, we just don’t have the money left.
What kind of message are we telling our contractors out there? Please do the work for the government and we’ll pay you when we think or when we feel?
The Minister talks...
Thank you, Minister Lafferty. Does committee agree?
Thank you, Mr. Hawkins. Minister Beaulieu.