Floyd Roland

Floyd Roland
Inuvik Boot Lake

Statements in Debates

Debates of , (day 33)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, part of the transition we went from our formula financing arrangements which we initially looked at extension of a year and then, as a result of the First Ministers’ meeting, got into a full-blown process that we are now entering into. That is the equalization panel and territorial formula financing. Part of that process was setting a base or a floor for transfers to the three territorial governments. That is what we have been able to build this budget on. We know, for example, that is what benefited us this year, 2004-05, where we got a little bit...

Debates of , (day 33)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, the Member is correct on formula financing. We are, at this time in our life as a government, heavily dependent on transfers from Ottawa, and receive up to 75 percent in any given year of our revenues from the federal government through transfers. We are hoping to turn that around, by the way, but it has been a slow process. The work that has been done recently has been driven by the federal government. Provinces and territories have raised the issue about formula financing and how it wasn’t working and meeting the needs that the initial program was...

Debates of , (day 33)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, governments from time to time find themselves in a position where they have to look at broad cuts across the board. We, as well, have looked at making some reductions and have implemented reductions and also, through this process we are entering into, are entering into more of the same. At the same time, when residents of the Northwest Territories are calling on us to provide more nurses, more doctors, more teachers, more social workers and they are saying we are not able to address the needs that they are being impacted by in their communities because of...

Debates of , (day 33)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, as we go through our exercise as a government, looking at how we spend our money, we look at a whole lot of areas to try to ensure that we don’t spend needlessly in areas, but there’s always a call for more money in different areas, whether it’s NGOs, within government trying to be prepared for a lot of the development that’s happening. Through the normal working of each department, when they are given targets, they look internally to see what areas that they can look at reducing before they go out to other areas. So as you will see as we go through this...

Debates of , (day 33)

In reducing expenditures, we took care to minimize the impact on services to the public. We looked to internal efficiencies and then to areas where the impact would only be felt within the government itself. After that, we looked at where we could reduce service levels or program support that would have minimal impact on the public. However, public impacts will be felt. It is simply not possible to reduce government spending by $40 million over two years and not have some impact on public services.

Mr. Speaker, there are many unmet social needs in each of our communities and sectors of our...

Debates of , (day 33)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I move, seconded by the honourable Member for Weledeh, that Bill 19, Appropriation Act, 2005-2006, be read for the first time. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Debates of , (day 33)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I support the idea of looking at how we attack the budget process cycle, planning, whatever we call it. At the same time, we have to realize that some of these actions also require a lot of initiative and workforce to refocus what they’re doing and come up with the numbers that we’d want as Members. Unfortunately, it does take, sometimes, a long time to turn things around. Again, there’s to and fro back in the House. Some plans are good, some things are changed. But we’re willing to sit down and try to work things through and come up with a way that we can...

Debates of , (day 33)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I am aware that the federal government has formulated a draft terms of reference. They haven’t been finalized as I am aware, at least I don’t have a copy of those. We are plugged in, in a sense, through federal Finance. Once we have that and we are able, from federal Finance, to share those, I would gladly share with Members of this House. Thank you.

Debates of , (day 33)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, when the decision to go ahead on the panel was moved by the federal government, we were asked to supply names to the federal government. We put forward names, along with the Yukon and Nunavut, on the formula financing side. We haven’t had confirmation as to the names on that side, that would be plugged in. But from the other side of it, as a government, we will continue to make sure whether it is going to be to the panel as a government or sending our staff to make sure that they are very aware of how we think the formula should work and the impacts...

Debates of , (day 33)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I am one of the Members and I have had a fair bit of history with the Government of the Northwest Territories. Quite a number of years ago, we went through the exercise of huge reductions. For example, we got rid of the Department of Personnel and told departments at that time they would have to fund from within and find a way to take care of human resources within their own department. We realize now by being disjointed in that fashion that that is not working. We are not meeting the needs of our own staff, as well as those who would come to the...