Floyd Roland

Floyd Roland
Inuvik Boot Lake

Statements in Debates

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 5)

As this scenario developed and as we went to Members highlighting the concerns that we had, by not taking any action there would be immediate impact on the Government of the Northwest Territories when it comes to our debt wall. By taking the steps we have and getting confirmation from the federal Minister of Finance, Minister Flaherty, to work with us in dealing with this debt around this project short-term relief we’ve been able to work through this scenario where there will not be an immediate impact.

As I was responding earlier to Member Bromley, there would be an impact in a sense of our...

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 5)

I’ll speak to the first part of that, and Ms. Melhorn can go towards the fiscal strategy that they laid out and presented to Members.

The timelines, as we’ve looked at it, we’re okay in the ’10-11 fiscal year. The ’11-12 year becomes problematic without the relief; ’12-13 becomes an issue, as well. But a five-year relief allows us the flexibility to then get back into a normal pattern, the cash demand is down, there is no impact. But let’s fully recognize that even we, as the 16th Assembly, when we came into office, without accepting any further debt, we we’re talking about tightening our belts...

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 5)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, as I stated earlier, through the environmental review process additional information was requested. That information was gathered and supplied to the review board around alternate sites. We go from $70 million to as high as $200 million, depending on the different scenarios that we’ve looked at: across-the-lake, underwater cable and so on. Substantially more expensive than what’s in place today. Without a business case, without a customer at a kilowatt hour, there is no project unless this government itself decides to pay the additional cost for going...

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 5)

Mr. Chairman, our request has been for a five-year relief on this. We’re, again as I said, the finance staff from Ottawa and our staff are in discussions. We’re trying to get as much information as possible for what Minister Flaherty is prepared to bring forward to his Cabinet colleagues. Thank you.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 5)

Mr. Speaker, one of the things we have to realize and recall, even the previous decisions made by the mines because of the economic downturn was they shut down for a number of months because of the cost of running their operations, and that takes into fact the cost of running their facilities in a remote location. Our plan would provide for power at a cheaper rate, thereby expanding mine lives, for example, or allowing a new mine to be developed, because one of the things that the shareholders of a mining operation have to take into consideration is the overall cost of doing business in the...

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 5)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Just very briefly, Mr. Chairman, when this issue first came up I approached the Finance Minister. I had to call, had a commitment to work on a relief project specific and at that point then followed up with committee and informed Members, as I have done here, that we developed a proposal that looked at five years. That’s what’s in front of them. We don’t know what they’re going to respond with, but I just felt that I needed to put that down as well, just for comment. Thank you.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 5)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Again I’d have to refer to the Minister of Finance as to that level of detail and if it’s been shared. I’m not familiar with it. I’ll go to Ms. Melhorn as to some additional information. I guess I’d have to refer to again the Minister of Finance and his staff to see if that is a meeting that can be arranged to provide that if it hasn’t been on that basis. The simple fact is the Member is saying he does not trust what he’s being presented.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 4)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, as well, I’d like to recognize the two Pages down from Inuvik: Ms. Caroline Kaufman and, I hope I get this name right, Evodia Mutua, as well. Thank you.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 4)

Thank you. We need to be careful what we ask for. For example, communities have been telling us up and down the Northwest Territories, north, south, east and west, they want more authority in making those decisions for what they feel are priorities in their community. We can set the standards and tell them what they can have and can’t have. That’s the way it used to be. Members calling for those days to come back I think will have the NWT Association of Communities making some calls rather quickly as to how we’re starting to pull it back to the centre, as some would say.

So I’m prepared to sit...

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 4)

Mr. Speaker, this whole Assembly decides, whenever we pass our budget, just how we deliver services in our communities. One of the things that we heard for many years was that communities needed to make their own decisions more often, much like tax-based municipalities do. So the New Deal that was established that is now into, I believe, its third or fourth year of delivery, that allows communities to make decisions. When you look at base-plus funding, that was incorporated in that so that it helped the smaller communities be able to deal with some of the higher cost issues and you look at our...