Jane Groenewegen

Okay. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I believe that the Minister said that that had not been shared with the Minister of Human Resources. He had not received a copy of that report. I would like to ask if that’s true, am I correct in that? Also, what’s the date of that particular report dealing with that efficiency? Thank you.

Thank you, Mr. Ramsay. Mr. Roland.

Question is being called. All those in favour? All those opposed? The motion is defeated.

---Defeated

Agreed. At this time, I will ask the Sergeant-at-Arms to escort the witnesses to the table.

Minister Roland, would you please introduce your witnesses for the record?

Thank you. To the motion. Mr. Pokiak.

Thank you, Mr. Roland. There is no committee response to this bill. At this time, I would like to ask the Minister if he would like to bring witnesses into the Chamber. Minister Roland.

Oh my goodness. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Now if that was not the most difficult thing to understand, that might win an award. Okay, so back to my question. Maybe I’m not calling it the right thing, but with respect to the recent difficulty that everybody is aware of, hello out there in the public service, everybody knows what I’m talking about, the implementation of the upgrade and the changes and the patches and things that were all done pre and post this thing going live and there being problems with it, and the denial by the Minister in this House that there had been a breech of...

Agreed. We’ll proceed with that after a brief break.

---SHORT RECESS

Thank you, Mr. Chair. So when Mr. Roland just made specific reference to go into the Audit Bureau, then I am to understand that nothing has transpired since 2000 involving the Audit Bureau in a report to look at the issue of a human resource management software. That is my question. Thank you.

Good afternoon, Members. I will call Committee of the Whole to order. We have several matters before us today. What is the wish of the committee? Mr. Lafferty.