Michael Miltenberger

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. After 17 years I’m glad you remembered who I am.

I’d like to take this opportunity to recognize a good old Metis boy from Fort Smith who’s made very well, and my companion for dinner just about weekly, and a man who has a long, sterling reputation in serving the people of the Northwest Territories, my friend and colleague, Mr. Tony Whitford.

Thank you, Madam Chair. I have with me Mike Aumond, deputy minister of Finance. Madam Chair, I’ll just quickly respond.

There will be more detailed discussion as we get into the individual departments. I’ve looked at the ITI budget operations expenditures on page 12-7, and I see $10.398 remaining for this year in the main estimates and last year the main estimates were $10.054. So I’m not sure where the Member got the $10.7 million, but hopefully that can be clarified in debate or in discussion with the Minister when we do the departmental review.

As well as the specific issues of the money...

A point of fact, the Member has no idea how I feel and he has no idea how hard I fought or not fought on this issue.

I think the proof is in the pudding. We have a project that is nearing completion. There have been challenges, without a doubt, and they’ve been reported and debated and discussed in this House and in the press.

Our first priority and our first full attention is to get the project done and completed, and open to traffic and generating revenue. After that, we have committed to doing a full post-mortem and we will make sure that that information is shared. It has nothing to do with...

What I will commit to is when the project is completed, we will do a review, a post-mortem to make sure that we learn the lessons necessary on what worked well, what didn’t work as well, how we structured ourselves, and the very many other issues that may flow out of that. I know the Member has indicated a very specific interest, but by just providing single pieces of correspondence or a sheaf of correspondence on a very, very complex process without a broad context and having all the pieces together would be counterproductive, in my mind, and we’re not in the position to do that until the...

We’ve been negotiating these agreements now for literally decades. There’s a very complex criteria in some cases with the formula funding agreement. As well, there’s a lot of specific criteria used. The health transfer numbers were laid out pretty clearly and bluntly by the federal Finance Minister. As I indicated, we have a working group through the Council of the Federation at work. That work that they’re doing is supposed to be ready for June when the Premiers meet at their next meeting. When that work is completed, we will have an idea collectively of what the landscape looks like or could...

The Member made reference in his statement to what sounded like what is referred to a base-plus approach to blended funding where you have a fixed amount, everybody receives a fixed amount and after that the calculations move to a per capita basis. That is an approach that is in use at every opportunity by every ministry of the government, and the territorial government as a whole supports that kind of approach. It has been put to use in some cases.

In regard to the health transfer, there’s a floor of no less than 3 percent. No province or territory is supposed to be disadvantaged using the...

I will look at Hansard. I agree with the Member that as we look to take over land, water, resource development, we want to be fully up to speed and up to date on all the rents, I think is how the Member referred to them. There are also other areas across the land, for example, where we want to look at are we putting the proper value on things like water. As we go forward as a territory looking at all these issue post-devolution, we will be looking at that and we will be having that discussion with Members, and I’m sure with Northerners as a whole.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. In regard to the response to listening to the MLA feedback, we have been listening very carefully. This document has gone through extensive consultation work with committee. We went through interim appropriation to allow for that cycle to take place. In addition, we got feedback when we finished the review of business plans from committees, which we are going to respond to through the supplementary appropriation process and we’ll have that debate. I would point out the asks in that letter; the combined asks, of my recollection, were in the neighbourhood of $4.3 or so...

As I indicated in the budget address, there are no new taxes in this particular budget. We do have some projects that I think are going to be a real boon economically as well as for building the North, like the fibre optic line. We do know with the conclusion of devolution and the resource revenue money that will flow, the A base funding that will flow, that we will have some additional revenue there as well. If our projections stay on target and there’s not any kind of negative downturn in this fragile global economy that we’re still in, then we anticipate there’s going to be some continued...

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I appreciate the Member’s comments. The issue of the escalation of operating expenses of government, I mean, that is a stark reality. As I laid out in the budget address, we are committed to restraining and constraining the growth of government and ensuring that our revenues exceed our expenditures so that, in fact, we can do the replenishment of our cash reserves and look for efficiencies within government. We are committed to, as I’ve already indicated, decentralization. The Premier has made that commitment in the House today. The Member is indicating that we should...