Robert Bouchard

Robert Bouchard
Hay River North

Statements in Debates

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)

Clauses 1 to 5.

---Clauses 1 through 15 inclusive approved

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)

Clauses 14 to 25.

---Clauses 14 through 25 inclusive approved

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)

Thank you, Ms. Kainz. Mr. Dolynny.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. The Minister keeps talking about we’re not done the bridge, and I’m not sure when we’re going to get that done. We know we’ve added stuff to the contract. We know we’ve added guardrails. We know we’ve added telephones to the system. Now we’re spending more money and the reason that this is on the floor today is because now we’re going to spend another 12 to 30 million dollars on the Tuk-Inuvik Highway. We’re willing to stroke a cheque for them, but when a contractor that’s done the work and has been talking to this government – and not only the Minister, the Premier...

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)

Thank you, Mr. MacDougall, for your years of service, and good luck in the future.

Sergeant-at-Arms, please escort the witnesses out of the Chamber.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)

Thank you, Ms. Bisaro. I’ll take those as general comments as well. Does committee agree we’ll go clause by clause?

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)

Question has been called. The motion has been carried.

---Carried

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)

Thank you, Mr. Dolynny. Mr. Grundy.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)

I am referring to Ruskin was on the job before ATCON started. We paid them out. We paid out several contractors that were doing work for ATCON that they held us accountable for the bridge. Rowe’s didn’t have that leverage. Why did we pay all those other contractors and we’re not paying Rowe’s?

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)

Bill 64 is now deemed ready for third reading as amended and printed. Does committee agree this is the conclusion of Bill 64?