Rylund Johnson

Rylund Johnson
Yellowknife North

Statements in Debates

Debates of , 19th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 63)

Thank you, Madam Chair. My understanding is that there is some talk about including the Metis Health Benefits or the federal government providing funding and rolling that up into the current benefits provided to Indigenous peoples. Can I just get an update of whether the federal government has made any progress on that or any information the department may have? Thank you.

Debates of , 19th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 63)

Thank you, Madam Chair. I understand we have added the ECE and Child and Family Services leasing. I am not opposed to adding. When we need space, we need it. What I am trying to understand is: on page 251, we spend $32 million on leases, but on 263, we spend $12 million on leases. I just would like to understand the difference between those two numbers. Thank you, Madam Chair.

Debates of , 19th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 63)

Thank you, Madam Chair. I know there has been discussion previously in this House and in the department about the possibility of providing supplementary health benefits to those who are without. That would be people who don't already have them through their employer, who are not covered under the medical Metis benefits here or the federal Indigenous benefits. Do we have a recent figure of how many people that would be? Thank you, Madam Chair.

Debates of , 19th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 63)

Thank you, Madam Chair. I am looking at page 251, and we spend $32 million a year on leases. If I go to the information item on 263, lease commitments, it's $12,124,000. Can I just get clarification of the difference between those numbers? I want to understand: how much a year are we spending on leases? Is it $32 million a year or $12 million? Thank you, Madam Chair.

Debates of , 19th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 63)

I'm happy to receive that timeline, and I look forward to this portal. My question is: do we have an idea of what sort of information we expect to initially populate our open data portal?

Debates of , 19th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 63)

Yes. Thank you, Madam Chair. I will leave this for another time, but it's my view that being the anchor tenant in a bunch of southern REITs' buildings makes absolutely no sense. It does not align with supporting northern businesses, and if we are actually paying above what it would cost for us, we are spending extra money instead of owning the infrastructure. Either we should build it as a government or find actual northern landlords to give that money to, would be my preference. I will leave that as a comment, and I thank the department for their comments on that.

In the area of asset...

Debates of , 19th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 63)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I'm following up on a commitment from the Minister of Finance who is responsible for the Chief Information Officer of a commitment to have an open government portal for the GNWT. My question is: when can we expect to see that open government portal? Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Debates of , 19th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 63)

Thank you, Madam Chair. Where I am going with this is that the GNWT is the anchor tenant in most of Northview's building. It's in downtown Yellowknife. My understanding is that we built a new government building because we understood it was cheaper for us to own our buildings as opposed to leasing them from large southern REITs. My question is specific to class A commercial office spaces. Is it cheaper for us to own it than it is to lease it right now at market rates in Yellowknife? Thank you, Madam Chair.

Debates of , 19th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 63)

Thank you, Madam Chair. I always have questions. The Department of Infrastructure under this section administers the Leasing of Improved Real Property, essentially the policy that controls how we lease all our property. This policy is from 1998, and I think it's a little outdated in regard to the work we are doing on procurement review. Is there any intention and a timeline to update the Leasing of Improved Real Property Policy? Thank you.

Debates of , 19th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 63)

Thank you, Madam Chair. I am looking at page 197, and I see that the Territorial Health Investment Fund about the medical travel and oral health and cultural competencies are expiring. My understanding is that this started in 2015 and went to 2018, and then the federal government once again announced, kind of, a new program to bring us to 2021. Are there any discussions or any talk of another Territorial Health Investment Fund, or is this fund simply sunsetted with no plans by the federal government to replace it? Thank you, Madam Chair.