Wendy Bisaro
Statements in Debates
I have two further questions. Should a site be missed in the analysis and the identification of all the sites within our Territory, should a particular site be missed and it be discovered some time after devolution, whose responsibility would it then be? I am assuming that a site that was the responsibility of the federal government when it was initially developed, it is missed in the census of sites, whose responsibility is it after devolution to clean that up? I will start with that. Thanks.
Mr. Chairman, I wanted to ask some questions here related to waste sites and the management of them and cleaning up of them and responsibility for them. With the AIP having been signed, I believe there is a section in there which deals with environmental liability and cleanup of waste sites, mine sites and so on. I would like to know from the Minister if he could explain the department’s responsibility in terms of waste sites and the impact the AIP will have on that responsibility. Thank you.
Thank you, Mr. Chair. I have a question here related to the money in the budget for geothermal. At the time of business plans there was a statement… I’ll back up. The Minister is well aware that the City of Yellowknife is putting intensive efforts into determining the feasibility and possibility to go forward on a geothermal project there in Yellowknife. I think the Minister probably should also know that the federal government has promised almost $15 million or up to $15 million based on whether or not the City is willing to sort of put in the other necessary funds. My question to the...
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I want to follow up on the question from Mr. Abernethy on the land use framework. It may be led by the Executive, but from the information in business plans, there was a fairly large investment by ENR in 2008-09, not so much in 2009-10, but then an $800,000 investment in this current year for develop and implement a land use framework. In the upcoming budget year, the information shows a reduction of $83,000. What are the actions of ENR relative to the land use framework in budget year 2011-12? Thank you.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Thanks to the Minister. I understand that she thinks that the NGOs are more comfortable. They are absolutely more comfortable with multi-year funding. I mentioned in my statement about a different method of funding and I wondered if the Minister would commit to consideration of a different method of funding. Specifically, will she discuss with her Cabinet colleagues the possibility of multi-year core funding for our NGO partners? Thank you.
Thanks to the Minister. I can appreciate that the department is reviewing, but I guess I’m really disappointed that as part of review we have to go backwards in order to do a review.
In a recent letter to the NWT Seniors’ Society, the Minister stated that the department recognizes the multi-year contribution agreements provide a certain degree of funding security. If that’s the case, I’m wondering why the Minister cannot, as a matter of policy, use multi-year contracts with NGOs like the NWT Seniors’ Society. Thank you.
I hope that is July of this year. Maybe I could get that clarified.
Mr. Chairman, I just have one last request. Is it possible that committee could see the outline of the process that is followed when land is sold? Thank you.
Mr. Chairman, thanks to the Minister. I am still not totally clear if the land that was sold was within the Town of Norman Wells block land transfer. I will try another example. If, for instance, in the area of the block land transfer for the City of Yellowknife -- it extends I think out to the Yellowknife River -- if there was a parcel of land somewhere before the ending of the block land transfer boundary for the City of Yellowknife, if somebody wanted to purchase that land from the GNWT, would they be able to do that? Thank you.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I have a question here. I recall, I think it was last year, it may have been two years ago, but certainly I think both when we were discussing NWT Housing Corporation and Municipal and Community Affairs, we talked about land ownership issues for the Housing Corporation to have ownership of lands on which they wanted to build houses in various communities. There was some work I think that MACA was doing at that time in terms of I think making things a little easier and getting things settled. I just wondered if I can get an update on where that issue is at. Thank you.