Robert Hawkins

Déclarations dans les débats

Debates of , (day 3)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Well, Mr. Speaker, we’re not allowed to ask the opinion of a Minister, although that would seem relevant in this particular case. However, Mr. Speaker, we pay for the surgery of this problem and it seems completely absurd why we would ignore the treatment side. I mean, what’s the point? So, Mr. Speaker, what would it take to get club foot on the extended health benefits list? Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Debates of , (day 3)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I’d like to follow up on my Member’s statement today and my questions will be directed to the Minister of Health and Social Services. Mr. Speaker, for the record, B.C. Ministry of Health notes that nerve damage from spina bifida can lead to deformities such as club foot. Mr. Speaker, with that said, when does the Minister see any type of update of our extended health benefits list to address this gap in services being provided to our children? Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Debates of , (day 2)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I’d like to recognize Marino Casebeer, a constituent of mine. I believe he’s just gotten a job recently with Arctic Energy Alliance, so I suspect he’s here for the announcement later today. Thank you.

---Applause

Debates of , (day 2)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I appreciate the Minister avoiding my question, which is the fact that the parents posed all of these formal questions to the Minister. Will he be formally responding to them? Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Debates of , (day 2)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, my questions will be for the Minister of Education, Culture and Employment. It is, yet again, about the Yellowknife school problem. Mr. Speaker, my question will be framed around lack of consistency, clarity and practice throughout the Northwest Territories where there is more than one school in that community. Is there any ECE legislative authority, policy or directive that is enforceable which points to a minimum capacity level that community schools must be at, and, if they are not, are they either amalgamated or closed?

Debates of , (day 2)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I can’t deny that the Finance Minister was correct on that information. However, I’m talking about a proactive approach that actually gets ahead of the problem before it gets away from us. I’m talking about getting ahead of the problem so we don’t have to work on trying to force and try to reach a compromise to have these big, deep, forensic-style audits. So, Mr. Speaker, the fact is the Auditor General will do this. All we have to do is put it in a line item now that we have the FAA open. Would the Minister reconsider that? Thank you.

Debates of , (day 2)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My questions will follow the line my Member’s statement drew out, so my questions will be directed to the Minister of Finance. Mr. Speaker, in short, I want to make sure our Crown corporations are giving all the NWT citizens value for money. Mr. Speaker, my question, therefore, is, is there a value to the directors of the Crown corporations and the GNWT shareholders in conducting occasional performance audits on Crown corporations? Can the Minister indicate whether there has been any progress on this file since I raised the issue back in February 2006? Thank you, Mr...

Debates of , (day 2)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. In February 2006, I made a statement on the need to perform regular performance or value for money audits on Crown corporations owned by the GNWT. At the time, the Finance Minister indicated he was open to examining the issue and possibly considering an expanded role for our very own Audit Bureau. Over a year has gone by and I have yet to hear anything from our fine Finance Minister on this issue and there have been no concrete steps on implementation of this idea.

We all know that Crown corporations are subject to annual financial audits by the Auditor General’s office...

Debates of , (day 2)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Well, Mr. Speaker, I urge the Minister to find an alternative solution because he talks about all of this work he has done for over the last two to three, even almost four years by striking out a report and striking out a committee and getting a mediator for the committee. You can only drag one school board to the committee discussions if they came with the point of view that they were going to get a school or else they didn’t want to participate. Why is the Minister not putting forward the shared solution so this community can more forward? Thank you.

Debates of , (day 2)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Often, when people respond at the spur of the moment on unique circumstances, I think they make a lot of mistakes, Mr. Speaker. That speaks to the frustration of the parents. So speaking to that issue, will the Minister be answering all of those questions posed by the parents so we can get on and find a solution to this issue? Thank you.