Daniel McNeely

Déclarations dans les débats

Committee Motion 59-18(3): Bill 6: Cannabis Legalization and Regulation Implementation Act – Amendment to Schedule A, Clause 5 – Addition of Subsection 5(1), Defeated
Debates of , 18th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 33)

Thank you, Mr. Chair. I think we said right from the start that, as we proceed forward in this very unknown market, we're probably not going to get it right. Right now, I think we can all agree in this room here that cannabis is not being sold here. It's being brought in to all 33 communities from other sources outside, south of the 60th parallel, or west or east or north, but there is no supply point here.

Assuming that we didn't have the system of alcohol sales, would we have designated these six communities as cannabis suppliers? Probably not. It's the system that we have and the tools that...

Committee Motion 65-18(3): Bill 6: Cannabis Legalization and Regulation Implementation Act – Substitution of subclause 1(4) of Bill 6, Carried
Debates of , 18th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 33)

To the motion. Mr. Testart.

Debates of , 18th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 33)

Thank you, Minister McLeod. Mr. Thompson.

Debates of , 18th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 33)

Clause 2?

Recorded Vote
Debates of , 18th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 33)

All those opposed, please rise.

Committee Motion 56-18(3): Committee Report 7-18(3): Standing Committee Review on Government Operation and Standing Committee on Social Development Report on the Review of Bill 6: Cannabis Legalization and Regulation Implementation Act – Northern E
Debates of , 18th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 32)

Mr. Chair, my questions have been answered.

Committee Motion 54-18(3): Committee Report 7-18(3): Standing Committee Review on Government Operation and Standing Committee on Social Development Report on the Review of Bill 6: Cannabis Legalization and Regulation Implementation Act – Inter-agen
Debates of , 18th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 32)

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Speaking to this motion here, when I'm talking about the Sahtu land claim, there are elements in the land claim which already exist on an intergovernmental working relationship to achieve these types of concerning issues there for the existing claim corporation which allows for program delivery. In my view, the element towards leading to this already exists. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Debates of , 18th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 32)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. First of all, I would like to thank both committees for taking the time to go out on the road and listen to the concerns of leaders, youth, students, elders, and the general public on our cannabis tour. I was involved in the northern group, and it could be said that this society is being modernized to what is here already. As we heard from our previous colleagues' presentations, cannabis really exists in all 33 communities, and, because it's a federally imposed legislation, we are trying to craft this legislation to design the society and the cultures and the...

Question 328-18(3): Energy Initiatives in the Sahtu Region
Debates of , 18th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 32)

Thanks to the Minister for that progress response. That is great news to hear. My next question: how is the GNWT working with Sahtu residents to ensure they are able to be equal partners in the economy?

Question 328-18(3): Energy Initiatives in the Sahtu Region
Debates of , 18th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 32)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My question today is for the Minister of Industry, ITI. My first question is: I noted with interest that the statement from Minister Schumann yesterday indicated that $180 million in funding is being invested in the energy infrastructure as part of the three-year rolling energy action plan that is expected to be released during this session. What is the GNWT doing to support the Sahtu region to benefit from this windfall? Mahsi.