Robert Hawkins

Thank you, Madam Chair. This budget, or I should say deficit, has been compared to an inheritance problem. I guess we could blame the 14th Assembly until we are blue in the face, but unfortunately we can’t give back this deficit issue. I would love to say thanks but no thanks, but I am having a difficult time exactly which way I am going to go. I mean I look at the struggle wherein if we don’t raise it we are going to lose more money. So I think of the struggle as Canada has got a noose around our neck, and the more we struggle by trying to be competitive, the tighter it gets, and it...

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, my topic today is to ask an obvious question. What is the BIP? It’s the business incentive policy, Mr. Speaker, but really what does that mean? It is to create a level playing field whereby we formally acknowledge that, tucked well within the beauty of our northern fresh air, our friendly-spirited environment, the government recognizes simple factors that need to be considered; obvious factors, Mr. Speaker, such as a jug of milk here costs more than it does in Calgary, and a kilowatt isn’t as cheap as it is in Edmonton. Mr. Speaker, labour comes at a...

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, in this particular case I'm going to state that I will be supporting this adjustment. Although very unusual probably for me to be enthusiastic about a tax increase, $7.54, under the $68,000 taxable income bracket, basically could represent a box of Tim Horton's doughnuts. So I don't think that's going to have a significant impact on that tax bracket.

The other side of the taxable income of $110,000 plus, the increase being $227 per year, we are really only talking about $15 a month so I don't think that will have a significant impact on that bracket...

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I will be supporting this motion. I think it is a good step, and I think it is a recognition that we still have to work a little harder to sharpen our pencils. As it has been said, I don’t really think that this burden is necessarily fair to be taken solely on the 15th Assembly’s shoulders, but unfortunately we have to make corrective actions. The Minister has quite clearly said that if we don’t take some steps we are going to be penalized by Canada. I think it is a good saw if we are taking corrective steps, and I think we need to go back to the drawing board and...

Thank you, Madam Chair. The Standing Committee on Accountability and Oversight conducted public reviews of Bill 2, An Act to Amend the Income Tax Act, on March 25 and 26, 2004. The committee would like to thank all the witnesses for their submissions which were made on very short notice. The committee would also like to thank the Minister and his staff for presenting the bill.

The committee was very concerned about the short amount of time allowed for the public to review and respond to this bill. Members appreciate that there were special circumstances in this case due to the recent...

Thank you, Madam Chair. If I could just follow up on the other expenses under phone bills. If the Minister could indicate if the territorial government is charged a flat rate for long-distance charges, do we have any specialized plans or anything like that? I realize it wasn’t just phone bills, but is the government engaged in a contract, therefore, we don’t pay, obviously, market rate for phone long-distance charges? Thank you, Madam Chair.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I have a motion to read.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I appreciate you pointing that out. I’m asking how is this statement being realized by waiving the BIP? Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I will pause on that question for now. The Minister indicated quite often we bring lawyers to these things. Does the Department of Justice pick up that travel cost? Why does the Ministry of Aboriginal Affairs pick up that cost if it’s the ministry’s cost? Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Thank you, Madam Chair. I will further vouch for the simplicity rather than paying from one treasury into another treasury door. So I can recognize the simplicity of not charging back. The last area that I want to probe and get a little more clarification, I had mentioned earlier and it probably got lost in my questions, which is the role and the obligation of other departments. Is there an obligation, for example, that any other department must consult with the Department of Public Works, recognizing the expertise and the role that the Department of Public Works plays? Is there any role...